Showing posts with label Reel Reviews - I. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reel Reviews - I. Show all posts
Saturday, March 26, 2016
Reel Reviews
The Interview -- You have to give Seth Rogan and James Franco credit for being willing to look really ridiculous for their art. The farce here is so broad that it’s probably stretching it to call this movie ‘art,’ but it delivers enough laughs that I suppose the guys should be given the benefit of the doubt. The only weird thing is, for all of its comedic intent, the film actually veers into some pretty violent territory now and then--a jarring lack of consistency which demerits the project overall (and may have been the reason that some people took the thing a little too seriously back when the movie was about to be released). Overall, this is a pretty good, funny movie; a little refinement would have gone a lot further.
Sunday, December 13, 2015
Reel Reviews
The Imitation Game -- Much of what you see here is actually very standard, boilerplate "outsider" drama, set in the equally standard venue of a World War II movie. The loser who ultimately wins, the challenge to authority, the competition won--it's all there, as it is in a hundred other films. So why is this movie different? Different enough to be really, really good? Two things. One, the true story goes beyond the win to show the outsider ultimately losing (though with a winning legacy); and two (and this is the thing that really makes the movie worth watching), the expert execution of the presentation, particularly in the job the actors do in inhabiting their roles. Special performances by the leads (and, for that matter, the supporting cast) elevate this pic from the standard to a truly special viewing experience.
Sunday, October 25, 2015
Reel Reviews
Into The Woods -- My hearing must be going. Once again I've watched a movie where I couldn't hear a lot of the dialogue--in this case, in musical form--over all the background noise and orchestration. Alas, the burden of getting old. The fact that that is my concern when thinking about this film is a warning sign; it's a movie that promises much but delivers not nearly enough. I'm not sure the "wisdom" of the fairy tale rewrites is all that wise; folk wisdom gets to be folk wisdom for a reason, and you coming along with your jaded worldview does not necessarily change everything. Oh well; at least you get to spend a chunk of a couple of hours with the awesomeness that is Anna Kendrick, so that's something.
Sunday, August 16, 2015
Reel Reviews
Interstellar -- I think this movie's heart is in the right place. Director Christopher Nolan has built a lot of equity with previous works, so one might be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, or at least a pass on certain things. But that also means there's a pretty high level of expectations attached to his projects, and this one does not live up to that hype. I'm not bothered by the predictability of what seems to be an obvious attempt at ginning up a big "shocking twist"; I'm more concerned about the vagueness surrounding much of the film's presentation: the unsteady science (including that one major boner that every screenwriter seems to love, misunderstanding black holes), the characters' odd motivations, even just the set-up for why all this is necessary in the first place. Indeed, the science is so vague in some places that this might be a more honest movie if it were an outright fantasy, with everyone wearing robes and pointed hats and doing magic rather than talking about wormholes. Too much of what may have been intended as atmospheric obscurity simply comes across as intellectual or creative laziness. If you want to shoot something into space in a rocket, make it your lack of willingness to work the problem all the way through.
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Reel Reviews -- I
I Am Sam (+) -- Most of the neofascists were calling Sean Penn a retard earlier this year. I wish those vermin had a shred of the sensitivity shown by Penn's performance in this film; this would be a better world than it is. As for the movie, it has its flaws--a little maudlin, and there are some egregious and grotesque product placements--but the heart is in the right place throughout. And Dakota Fanning is the reigning World Champion in Adorable. Posted 11/20/03.
The Ice Harvest (--) -- A run of the mill crime caper: the nervous partner, the crazier, cagier partner, the "perfect" crime, and how it all unwinds. All of this you've seen dozens of times before. This one brings its own unique touches of bad execution--Billy Bob Thornton's character, who seems more interesting than John Cusack's nervous shlub, disappears for long stretches of the story--to complement the standard issue cliches. It has its moments, as any professionally made movie will, but mostly it just leaves the viewer cold. Posted 4/19/07.
The Ice Storm (--) -- A film with a measured pace, to say the least. Makes you want to scream at the screen, "Somebody please do something!" And really, who gives a shit about suburban angst in the '70's anyway?
Identity (+) -- Well, that was a trip. A good one, for this type of movie, which is not really my thing. You could argue about certain implausibilities, but then again, the whole thing is implausible; why quibble about the talking bird when the whole sky is filled with pink elephants? The ending is a little weak, but the writing is sharp, the performances are excellent, and it's not too long (a common problem with movies of this ilk). All in all, a good time at the movies. Posted 5/31/04.
Idiocracy (~) -- Let he who is without the sin...You've set yourself up for a rough ride when you make a movie about the ubiquity of stupidity, then turn around and seed lots of stupid throughout the movie itself. I'm feeling what Mike Judge has to say here, but the execution could have been much, much better. You've got to think it through! Posted 5/9/09.
Igby Goes Down (~) -- Such a sordid little tale. This one tells us that the East Coast idle rich are evil and loathesome. Duh. Still, they can also be occasionally funny, as seen here every once in a while (though not enough to make the film a must see). Posted 12/31/03.
The Illusionist (+) -- A terrific film of subtlety and intelligence. Most of the pleasure comes from watching two masters, Edward Norton and Paul Giamatti, perform the difficult work of creating memorable characters while making the task seem effortless. Not to be missed. Posted 2/24/08.
The Importance of Being Earnest (+) -- Colin Firth and Rupert Everett make a fine pair of scalawags, and Reese Witherspoon acquits herself well with the faux English accent, but as usual it's the Wildean wit that shines most brightly. Those bon mots by themselves are a reason to watch this film. Posted 8/26/06.
In A World… (+) -- Charming. That’s the watchword here. As a comedy, it’s only mildly amusing; not many laugh out loud moments here, more a steady stream of grins. As a slice of life piece centered within one particular piece of one particular industry--the voiceover industry for movies and TV--the story has an interesting background and setting for its generally agreeable cast of characters. (Even the otherwise execrable Demitri Martin acquits himself well here.) And kudos to Lake Bell, not just for writing, directing and starring in the movie, but also for rocking the overalls in several scenes of this flick (I can’t resist a chick in overalls). Posted 5/23/14.
In Bruges (+) -- The positive review comes tenuously here. This movie is described and was advertised as a comedy, but it’s possibly the most uncomedic comedy ever. But it’s not bad--interesting, entertaining, and a little different, just not particularly funny. I suspect many potential viewers wouldn’t “get” this flick, but those of us who are more broad-minded and willing to stretch the boundaries will probably enjoy it. Posted 3/9/13.
Inception (+) -- Christopher Nolan is rapidly rising up the roster of cinema's greatest directors, and here's another booster rocket for his rep. The plot and its execution may include more serpentine twists and turns than many audience members will tolerate, but the viewer who's willing to work a little is rewarded by the imaginative breadth of the vision and the deft execution applied to the visual presentation. How deep can you go indeed? If you're a sharp tack, take this plunge and you won't regret it. Posted 8/11/11.
Inside Llewyn Davis (~) -- Once again, the Coen brothers display their minor obsession with Homer’s Odyssey. They might want to pull that classic down from the shelf and actually read it sometime, because, you see, that work actually had a story--something the Coens seem to be growing less and less concerned with as the years go along. This is a tough call, because I admit that this is a mostly entertaining movie that holds the interest, especially during the performance scenes (the music is very strong here, though if you’re not much for folkie stuff you might not be swayed to that point of view). But I also find this lack of attention to an actual narrative to be more and more grating with each film the brothers put out. Being oblique and vaguely existential may be entertaining to the brothers, but it doesn’t necessarily entertain us, the audience. If your tolerance moves through a wide orbit, you’ll probably like this film very much; but if you want something a little closer to the heart of the storytelling experience, this probably isn’t it. Posted 6/2/14.
Intolerable Cruelty (+) -- Lightweight, but it achieves what it aims for. The strength here is the work of George Clooney, who really looks like he's enjoying himself. That enthusiasm will carry you through and give you a few laughs. If you go in with the right attitude, that should be enough. Posted 2/25/05.
Iron Man 2 (+) -- Release-time reviews of this film made it seem like a major stumble by the same team of producers and actors who produced the original. In my eyes, the movie came across much better than expected. The events depicted seemed like logical extensions (in the fantasy sense) of the first flick's story, without any glaring false notes. It may suffer from a lack of freshness, a given considering the film is a sequel, but it's certainly not the worst "2" ever made. Hell, it's probably not the worst sequel made last year. As simple, big entertainment, the movie hits its marks, and that makes it worth a look. Posted 5/18/11.
Iron Man 3 (+) -- There isn’t much new here, which makes sense as it’s the third in a series. Naturally, there’s a pretty good amount of popcorn fun in this tentpole production, and the principals have lost little of their charm in the course of the years. But some of the magic, the spark that made the original so enjoyable, is lacking here. Still, given the nature of the film, you have to say it achieves its goals, and ultimately that works to the audience’s advantage. Posted 1/8/14.
Iron Monkey (+) -- Maybe I'm grading on a curve. It's not really spectacular, and there's some silliness in the characters and dubbed dialogue, but there are also well done action sequences and effective relationships among the main characters. So I'll give it a passing grade. You could do worse than this if you have an idle Saturday night and wish to kill some time. Posted 3/22/04.
The Island (--) -- Creepy, to be sure, but not necessarily in the way the makers had hoped. Maybe it never occurred to them that overblown movies created by abuse of technology are not much better than dystopian worlds created by abuse of technology. Yeah, you can watch it feeling there's a moral to this tale of cloning for greed and venality, but then some grotesque product placement comes along and blows that idea out of the water. And that doesn't even cover the confusing, badly-directed action sequences that invade the screen as exercises in empty destruction. Banish this one to some far off, isolated land. Posted 3/28/07.
It Happened One Night (+) -- The revelation here is Clark Gable's confident, effective performance as the cagey reporter who finds a handful of a story in Claudette Colbert's runaway heiress. That, combined with a good script and Capra's professional direction, makes for a very enjoyable movie. The only quibble: it's a little too long. Posted 7/30/05.
Italian For Beginners (~) -- It sure takes its sweet time getting around to the "plot," as it were (there's not much of a plot to begin with, but that's another story). Ultimately, it starts to make sense, and you get some real cinematic charm from characters you like. But the shockingly low production values--hand-held digital video camerawork, with little to no artistry or (dare I say it) mise-en-scene--make you feel like you're watching a low-rate foreign porn flick, except nobody's getting naked. A tough call, really--if you're not big on foreign films, you can probably skip it. Posted 4/1/04.
The Italian Job (~) -- Maybe there should be a Theory of Devolution, too. I don't know from the original, but this version of The Italian Job leaves you wondering why it needed to be remade. They certainly packed an awful lot of dumb in these two hours. Sure, the action sequences are technically proficient, but man, "Teh stupid, TEH STUPID! AUGH!" Posted 4/16/09.
The Ice Harvest (--) -- A run of the mill crime caper: the nervous partner, the crazier, cagier partner, the "perfect" crime, and how it all unwinds. All of this you've seen dozens of times before. This one brings its own unique touches of bad execution--Billy Bob Thornton's character, who seems more interesting than John Cusack's nervous shlub, disappears for long stretches of the story--to complement the standard issue cliches. It has its moments, as any professionally made movie will, but mostly it just leaves the viewer cold. Posted 4/19/07.
The Ice Storm (--) -- A film with a measured pace, to say the least. Makes you want to scream at the screen, "Somebody please do something!" And really, who gives a shit about suburban angst in the '70's anyway?
Identity (+) -- Well, that was a trip. A good one, for this type of movie, which is not really my thing. You could argue about certain implausibilities, but then again, the whole thing is implausible; why quibble about the talking bird when the whole sky is filled with pink elephants? The ending is a little weak, but the writing is sharp, the performances are excellent, and it's not too long (a common problem with movies of this ilk). All in all, a good time at the movies. Posted 5/31/04.
Idiocracy (~) -- Let he who is without the sin...You've set yourself up for a rough ride when you make a movie about the ubiquity of stupidity, then turn around and seed lots of stupid throughout the movie itself. I'm feeling what Mike Judge has to say here, but the execution could have been much, much better. You've got to think it through! Posted 5/9/09.
Igby Goes Down (~) -- Such a sordid little tale. This one tells us that the East Coast idle rich are evil and loathesome. Duh. Still, they can also be occasionally funny, as seen here every once in a while (though not enough to make the film a must see). Posted 12/31/03.
The Illusionist (+) -- A terrific film of subtlety and intelligence. Most of the pleasure comes from watching two masters, Edward Norton and Paul Giamatti, perform the difficult work of creating memorable characters while making the task seem effortless. Not to be missed. Posted 2/24/08.
The Importance of Being Earnest (+) -- Colin Firth and Rupert Everett make a fine pair of scalawags, and Reese Witherspoon acquits herself well with the faux English accent, but as usual it's the Wildean wit that shines most brightly. Those bon mots by themselves are a reason to watch this film. Posted 8/26/06.
In A World… (+) -- Charming. That’s the watchword here. As a comedy, it’s only mildly amusing; not many laugh out loud moments here, more a steady stream of grins. As a slice of life piece centered within one particular piece of one particular industry--the voiceover industry for movies and TV--the story has an interesting background and setting for its generally agreeable cast of characters. (Even the otherwise execrable Demitri Martin acquits himself well here.) And kudos to Lake Bell, not just for writing, directing and starring in the movie, but also for rocking the overalls in several scenes of this flick (I can’t resist a chick in overalls). Posted 5/23/14.
In Bruges (+) -- The positive review comes tenuously here. This movie is described and was advertised as a comedy, but it’s possibly the most uncomedic comedy ever. But it’s not bad--interesting, entertaining, and a little different, just not particularly funny. I suspect many potential viewers wouldn’t “get” this flick, but those of us who are more broad-minded and willing to stretch the boundaries will probably enjoy it. Posted 3/9/13.
Inception (+) -- Christopher Nolan is rapidly rising up the roster of cinema's greatest directors, and here's another booster rocket for his rep. The plot and its execution may include more serpentine twists and turns than many audience members will tolerate, but the viewer who's willing to work a little is rewarded by the imaginative breadth of the vision and the deft execution applied to the visual presentation. How deep can you go indeed? If you're a sharp tack, take this plunge and you won't regret it. Posted 8/11/11.
Inside Llewyn Davis (~) -- Once again, the Coen brothers display their minor obsession with Homer’s Odyssey. They might want to pull that classic down from the shelf and actually read it sometime, because, you see, that work actually had a story--something the Coens seem to be growing less and less concerned with as the years go along. This is a tough call, because I admit that this is a mostly entertaining movie that holds the interest, especially during the performance scenes (the music is very strong here, though if you’re not much for folkie stuff you might not be swayed to that point of view). But I also find this lack of attention to an actual narrative to be more and more grating with each film the brothers put out. Being oblique and vaguely existential may be entertaining to the brothers, but it doesn’t necessarily entertain us, the audience. If your tolerance moves through a wide orbit, you’ll probably like this film very much; but if you want something a little closer to the heart of the storytelling experience, this probably isn’t it. Posted 6/2/14.
Intolerable Cruelty (+) -- Lightweight, but it achieves what it aims for. The strength here is the work of George Clooney, who really looks like he's enjoying himself. That enthusiasm will carry you through and give you a few laughs. If you go in with the right attitude, that should be enough. Posted 2/25/05.
Iron Man 2 (+) -- Release-time reviews of this film made it seem like a major stumble by the same team of producers and actors who produced the original. In my eyes, the movie came across much better than expected. The events depicted seemed like logical extensions (in the fantasy sense) of the first flick's story, without any glaring false notes. It may suffer from a lack of freshness, a given considering the film is a sequel, but it's certainly not the worst "2" ever made. Hell, it's probably not the worst sequel made last year. As simple, big entertainment, the movie hits its marks, and that makes it worth a look. Posted 5/18/11.
Iron Man 3 (+) -- There isn’t much new here, which makes sense as it’s the third in a series. Naturally, there’s a pretty good amount of popcorn fun in this tentpole production, and the principals have lost little of their charm in the course of the years. But some of the magic, the spark that made the original so enjoyable, is lacking here. Still, given the nature of the film, you have to say it achieves its goals, and ultimately that works to the audience’s advantage. Posted 1/8/14.
Iron Monkey (+) -- Maybe I'm grading on a curve. It's not really spectacular, and there's some silliness in the characters and dubbed dialogue, but there are also well done action sequences and effective relationships among the main characters. So I'll give it a passing grade. You could do worse than this if you have an idle Saturday night and wish to kill some time. Posted 3/22/04.
The Island (--) -- Creepy, to be sure, but not necessarily in the way the makers had hoped. Maybe it never occurred to them that overblown movies created by abuse of technology are not much better than dystopian worlds created by abuse of technology. Yeah, you can watch it feeling there's a moral to this tale of cloning for greed and venality, but then some grotesque product placement comes along and blows that idea out of the water. And that doesn't even cover the confusing, badly-directed action sequences that invade the screen as exercises in empty destruction. Banish this one to some far off, isolated land. Posted 3/28/07.
It Happened One Night (+) -- The revelation here is Clark Gable's confident, effective performance as the cagey reporter who finds a handful of a story in Claudette Colbert's runaway heiress. That, combined with a good script and Capra's professional direction, makes for a very enjoyable movie. The only quibble: it's a little too long. Posted 7/30/05.
Italian For Beginners (~) -- It sure takes its sweet time getting around to the "plot," as it were (there's not much of a plot to begin with, but that's another story). Ultimately, it starts to make sense, and you get some real cinematic charm from characters you like. But the shockingly low production values--hand-held digital video camerawork, with little to no artistry or (dare I say it) mise-en-scene--make you feel like you're watching a low-rate foreign porn flick, except nobody's getting naked. A tough call, really--if you're not big on foreign films, you can probably skip it. Posted 4/1/04.
The Italian Job (~) -- Maybe there should be a Theory of Devolution, too. I don't know from the original, but this version of The Italian Job leaves you wondering why it needed to be remade. They certainly packed an awful lot of dumb in these two hours. Sure, the action sequences are technically proficient, but man, "Teh stupid, TEH STUPID! AUGH!" Posted 4/16/09.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
